Tuesday, October 27 Lake Park
  1. Home
  2. Lake Park
  3. Statistics
  4. Economy & jobs
  5. Below the poverty line
Economy & jobs Statistics · City estimate

Below the poverty line in Lake Park

2013 – 2024 · 12 data points 186 of 391 · Towns of Florida Updated Oct 27, 2026

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates, 2013 – 2024

Below the poverty line, 2013 – 2024 percent · Lake Park · Palm Beach County · Florida · United States
−18.5 pp since 2014
Lake Park Palm Beach County Florida United States

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates, 2013 – 2024

Compared with Below the poverty line · percent
Lake Park
10.8%
Florida
12.6%

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates

The series at a glance Lake Park · 2013 – 2024
Latest value 10.8% · 2024
First value 28.2% · 2013
Highest 29.3% · 2014
Lowest 10.8% · 2024
Data points 12

By year

All years · 2013 – 2024

YearLake ParkChange Palm Beach CountyFloridaUnited States
2024estimate 10.8% −3.7 pp 11.3% 12.6% 12.5%
2023estimate 14.5% −1.0 pp 11.1% 12.6% 12.4%
2022estimate 15.5% +0.3 pp 11.4% 12.9% 12.5%
2021estimate 15.2% −5.0 pp 11.6% 13.1% 12.6%
2020estimate 20.2% +4.6 pp 11.6% 13.3% —
2019estimate 15.6% −2.2 pp 12.2% 14.0% —
2018estimate 17.7% −1.0 pp 12.8% 14.8% —
2017estimate 18.7% −2.9 pp 13.4% 15.5% —
2016estimate 21.6% −2.9 pp 13.9% 16.1% —
2015estimate 24.5% −4.8 pp 14.5% 16.5% —
2014estimate 29.3% +1.0 pp 14.6% 16.7% —
2013estimate 28.2% 14.5% 16.3% —

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates, 2013 – 2024

Ranking · Towns of Florida

2019 · Place 1 is the highest value.

#TerritoryBelow the poverty line
1 Captiva 53.1%
2 Masaryktown 41.6%
3 Opa-locka 41.2%
4 Belle Glade 41.1%
5 Brownsville 40.1%
6 Florida City 40.0%
7 Chiefland 38.8%
8 Dover 38.5%
9 Pahokee 37.8%
10 Goodland 37.4%
11 Immokalee 37.4%
12 St Leo 37.3%
13 Inglis 36.6%
14 Gladeview 35.9%
15 University 35.4%
16 Panacea 34.0%
17 Goulding 32.7%
18 Perry 31.9%
19 Pierson 31.6%
20 South Bay 30.8%
21 Crystal Springs 30.7%
22 Fort Pierce 29.4%
23 Mangonia Park 29.1%
24 Carrabelle 28.9%
25 Beverly Hills 28.7%
…
128 Floral City 15.6%
129 Bokeelia 15.6%
130 Callahan 15.6%
131 Lake Park 15.6%
132 Bradenton 15.5%
133 Defuniak Springs 15.5%
134 Lecanto 15.5%
…

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates, 2019

What it means

The share of residents living in households below the official poverty threshold.

How it is calculated

Residents in households whose income is below the federal poverty threshold for their size, from the survey.