Thursday, October 22 Captiva
  1. Home
  2. Statistics
  3. Economy & jobs
  4. Below the poverty line
Economy & jobs Statistics · City estimate

Below the poverty line in Captiva

2013 – 2024 · 12 data points 2 of 391 · Towns of Florida Updated Oct 22, 2026

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates, 2013 – 2024

Below the poverty line, 2013 – 2024 percent · Captiva · Lee County · Florida · United States
−12.9 pp since 2014
Captiva Lee County Florida United States

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates, 2013 – 2024

Compared with Below the poverty line · percent
Captiva
47.5%
Lee County
12.0%
Florida
12.6%

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates

The series at a glance Captiva · 2013 – 2024
Latest value 47.5% · 2024
First value 40.0% · 2013
Highest 64.7% · 2016
Lowest 40.0% · 2013
Data points 12

By year

All years · 2013 – 2024

YearCaptivaChange Lee CountyFloridaUnited States
2024estimate 47.5% −9.9 pp 12.0% 12.6% 12.5%
2023estimate 57.4% +4.4 pp 11.7% 12.6% 12.4%
2022estimate 53.0% +6.4 pp 11.7% 12.9% 12.5%
2021estimate 46.6% −12.8 pp 12.0% 13.1% 12.6%
2020estimate 59.4% +6.3 pp 11.8% 13.3% —
2019estimate 53.1% −0.8 pp 13.1% 14.0% —
2018estimate 53.9% −6.4 pp 14.0% 14.8% —
2017estimate 60.3% −4.4 pp 14.9% 15.5% —
2016estimate 64.7% +0.9 pp 15.5% 16.1% —
2015estimate 63.8% +3.4 pp 16.1% 16.5% —
2014estimate 60.4% +20.4 pp 16.0% 16.7% —
2013estimate 40.0% 15.4% 16.3% —

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates, 2013 – 2024

Ranking · Towns of Florida

2017 · Place 1 is the highest value.

#TerritoryBelow the poverty line
1 Chokoloskee 63.5%
2 Captiva 60.3%
3 Opa-locka 50.9%
4 Goulding 46.7%
5 Seville 43.7%
6 Immokalee 43.4%
7 Tice 42.6%
8 Florida City 41.2%
9 Chiefland 40.7%
10 Gladeview 40.4%
11 Belle Glade 39.1%
12 Fellsmere 38.8%
13 University 37.8%
14 Dover 37.6%
15 Canal Point 37.3%
16 Brownsville 36.7%
17 St Leo 36.4%
18 Fort Pierce 35.8%
19 Otter Creek 34.9%
20 South Bay 34.8%
21 Wewahitchka 33.9%
22 Mangonia Park 33.7%
23 De Leon Springs 33.6%
24 Naranja 32.9%
25 Beverly Hills 32.9%
…

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates, 2017

What it means

The share of residents living in households below the official poverty threshold.

How it is calculated

Residents in households whose income is below the federal poverty threshold for their size, from the survey.